Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.057
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(2): 451-457.e2, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572700

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients have a penicillin allergy label, but less than 5% of them are actually allergic. Unnecessary penicillin avoidance is associated with serious medical consequences. Given the growing number of these labels, it is imperative that our diagnostic strategy for penicillin allergy be as efficient as possible. The validity of traditionally used skin tests (STs) has been questioned, whereas drug provocation testing (DPT), the criterion standard, without previous ST appears very safe in most cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of direct DPT without consideration for ST results and the validity of ST in the diagnosis of penicillin allergy. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study without a control group, we recruited patients consulting an allergist for penicillin allergy. Patients underwent ST followed by DPT regardless of ST results. Patients with anaphylaxis to penicillin within the past 5 years or a severe delayed reaction were excluded, as were those with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidity. RESULTS: None of the 1002 recruited patients had a serious reaction to DPT. Ten (1.0%) had a mild immediate reaction, of whom only 1 (0.1%) was considered likely IgE-mediated. The positive and negative predictive values of ST for an immediate reaction were 3.6% and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a low-risk adult population reporting penicillin allergy, ST has very poor positive predictive value. Direct DPT without ST is safe and appears to be an ideal diagnostic strategy to remove penicillin allergy labels that could be implemented in first-line practice.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/complicações , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos
2.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 63(4): 406-411, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561287

RESUMO

This study investigated the characteristics and frequency of perioperative anaphylactic shock induced by cefuroxime, so as to provide a reference for the safe and rational use of cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Cases of perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime in our hospital from 2011 to 2021 were extracted from the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System. Literature reporting adverse drug reactions (ADR) including cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic shock in perioperative settings was collected from the CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their respective inception to May 2022. Statistical analysis was performed for all cases of cefuroxime-induced perioperative anaphylactic shock. A total of 31 patients were included [13 men (48.1%) and 14 women (51.9%)], most of whom were over 60 years old (n=16, 59.3%); 9 (29.0%) patients had a history of drug allergy; 5 (16.1%) patients had received skin tests, but with negative results; 28 (90.3%) patients received treatment intravenously; 22 (71.0%) patients were treated after anesthesia. For 20 (64.5%) patients the ADR occurred within 10 minutes after anesthesia. The main manifestations were hypotension, dyspnea, rash, and tachycardia. For all patients, symptoms resolved after withdrawal of the drug and active rescue, and there were no deaths. A history of allergy and skin test findings may have limitations in predicting perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime; greater vigilance should be exercised when using cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Close monitoring is recommended for patients undergoing treatment with cefuroxime. Rescue therapy should be administered for allergic shock, and suitable response measures must be taken in a timely manner to ensure the safety of patients.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cefuroxima/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Testes Cutâneos/efeitos adversos
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 35(3): e14096, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38425150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) is frequently suspected in children, but a drug provocation test (DPT) rules it out in over 90% of cases. Direct oral DPT (DODPT), without skin or other previous tests, is increasingly been used to delabel non-immediate BLA reactions. This real-world study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of DODPT in children with immediate and non-immediate reactions to BLAs. METHODS: Ambispective registry study in children (<15 years), attended between 2016 and 2023 for suspected BLA allergy in 15 hospitals in Spain that routinely perform DODPT. RESULTS: The study included 2133 patients with generally mild reactions (anaphylaxis 0.7%). Drug provocation test with the implicated BLA was performed in 2014 patients (94.4%): 1854 underwent DODPT (86.9%, including 172 patients with immediate reactions). One hundred forty-five (7.2%) had symptoms associated with DPT, although only four reactions were severe: two episodes of anaphylaxis and two of drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome, which resolved rapidly with treatment. Of the 141 patients with mild reactions in the first DPT, a second DPT was considered in 87 and performed in 57, with 52 tolerating it without symptoms. Finally, BLA allergy was ruled out in 90.9% of the sample, confirmed in 3.4%, and remained unverified, usually due to loss to follow-up, in 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral DPT is a safe, effective procedure even in immediate mild reactions to BLA. Many reactions observed in DPT are doubtful and require confirmation. Severe reactions are exceptional and amenable to treatment. Direct oral DPT can be considered for BLA allergy delabeling in pediatric primary care.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Criança , Humanos , beta-Lactamas , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Monobactamas
4.
J Toxicol Sci ; 49(4): 163-174, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556353

RESUMO

Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2), expressed on mast cells, is associated with drug-induced pseudo-allergic reactions. Although it is well known that there are differences of sensitivity between species in the pseudo-allergic reactions, no platform for evaluating a human risk of the pseudo-allergic reactions observed in nonclinical studies has been established. Valemetostat tosylate, developed as an anti-cancer drug, induced histamine release in a nonclinical study with dogs. The purpose of the current study was to identify the mechanism and assess the human risk of valemetostat-tosylate-induced histamine release using dog and human MRGPRX2-expressing cells. In an experiment with human or dog MRGPRX2-expressing cells, valemetostat tosylate caused activation of human and dog MRGPRX2. Importantly, the EC50 for dog MRGPRX2 was consistent with the Cmax value at which histamine release was observed in dogs. Furthermore, the EC50 for human MRGPRX2 was ca. 27-fold higher than that for dog MRGPRX2, indicating a species difference in histamine-releasing activity. In a clinical trial, histamine release was not observed in patients receiving valemetostat tosylate. In conclusion, an in vitro assay using human and animal MRGPRX2-expressing cells would be an effective platform to investigate the mechanism and predict the human risk of histamine release observed in nonclinical studies.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Liberação de Histamina , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Mastócitos , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Receptores de Neuropeptídeos/genética
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 197, 2024 Mar 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preterm labor is caused by multiple etiologies, including intra-amniotic infection and/or intra-amniotic inflammation, vascular disorders, cervical disease, decidual senescence, and breakdown of maternal-fetal tolerance. Accumulating evidence in vivo and in vitro has shown that an allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis, can induce preterm uterine contractions. This report describes a case of a pregnant woman who developed anaphylaxis and regular uterine contractions after the ingestion of a strawberry-coated biscuit. We also review the mechanism of allergic reaction (hypersensitivity)-induced preterm labor. Case presentation A 31-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) at 30+2 weeks of gestation was admitted to the labor and delivery unit with regular uterine contractions and anaphylactic symptoms after she ingested a strawberry-coated biscuit as a snack. The uterine contractions resolved after the treatment of anaphylaxis by administering antihistamines and epinephrine. The patient subsequently delivered at 39+3 weeks of gestation. The amniotic fluid profile showed no infection or inflammation. A postpartum skin-prick test confirmed a positive type 1 hypersensitivity reaction to the strawberry-coated biscuit. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of anaphylaxis-induced uterine contractility in which uterine contractions subsided after the treatment of anaphylaxis. The absence of intra-amniotic infection and/or intra-amniotic inflammation and the cause of the anaphylaxis were confirmed. Our findings indicate that maternal allergic reactions may be one of the mechanisms of preterm labor.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Corioamnionite , Trabalho de Parto , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro , Nascimento Prematuro , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Humanos , Adulto , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/complicações , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/diagnóstico , Contração Uterina , Líquido Amniótico/metabolismo , Inflamação , Corioamnionite/metabolismo
6.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 130: 111767, 2024 Mar 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430809

RESUMO

AIM: To analyze the risk factors for oxaliplatin (OXA)-induced severe hypersensitivity reactions and identify the recurrence rate of the reactions after an OXA rechallenge in patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). METHODS: Among the 2251 patients treated with HAIC (OXA), 84 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who displayed hypersensitivity reactions between May 2013 and May 2022 were included in this study. Among the 84 patients, 23 (27.4%) developed severe anaphylactic reactions (grade III/IV), and 61 (72.6%) developed grade I/II reactions. We explored the risk factors for severe OXA-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Twenty-seven patients with grade I/II reactions underwent retreatment (HAIC with OXA), and the recurrence rate of the hypersensitivity reactions was determined. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for OXA-induced hypersensitivity reaction. RESULTS: In the study, multivariate analysis indicated that the dose of OXA (odds ratio [OR] 3.077, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.106-8.558, p = 0.031) was an independent risk factor for OXA-induced severe hypersensitivity reactions. Twenty-seven patients with non-severe hypersensitivity reactions underwent retreatment HAIC with OXA and 14 (51.9 %) experienced HSR recurrence, including 2 (7.4 %) who experienced hypersensitivity shock. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of OXA doses is a risk factor for OXA-induced severe hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with HAIC (OXA). Rechallenging HAIC with OXA appears to be associated with a higher recurrence rate of the HSR.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Oxaliplatina/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico
7.
ACS Nano ; 18(12): 8733-8744, 2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469811

RESUMO

Covalent conjugation of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is frequently employed to enhance the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of various protein and nanoparticle therapeutics. Unfortunately, some PEGylated drugs can induce elevated levels of antibodies that can bind PEG, i.e., anti-PEG antibodies (APA), in some patients. APA in turn can reduce the efficacy and increase the risks of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. There is currently no intervention available in the clinic that specifically mitigates allergic reactions to PEGylated drugs without the use of broad immunosuppression. We previously showed that infusion of high molecular weight free PEG could safely and effectively suppress the induction of APA in mice and restore prolonged circulation of various PEGylated therapeutics. Here, we explored the effectiveness of free PEG as a prophylaxis against anaphylaxis induced by PEG-specific allergic reactions in swine. Injection of PEG-liposomes (PL) resulted in anaphylactoid shock (pseudoanaphylaxis) within 1-3 min in both naïve and PL-sensitized swine. In contrast, repeated injection of free PEG alone did not result in allergic reactions, and injection of free PEG effectively suppressed allergic reactions to PL, including in previously PL-sensitized swine. These results strongly support the further investigation of free PEG for reducing APA and allergic responses to PEGylated therapeutics.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Animais , Suínos , Camundongos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Distribuição Tecidual , Nanomedicina , Polietilenoglicóis/farmacologia , Anticorpos/metabolismo , Lipossomos/farmacologia
9.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 109: 96-99, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467266

RESUMO

Esophageal thermal injury is one of the most devastating complications of atrial radiofrequency ablation, and its diagnosis can be challenging. In this report, we highlight the novel use of free water as a contrast material to better visualize the esophageal lumen in a patient with anaphylaxis to Iodinated contrast media and Gadolinium who recently underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. This becomes particularly handy in patients with contrast allergy, and further emphasizes the role of multimodality imaging.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Perfuração Esofágica , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Perfuração Esofágica/diagnóstico , Perfuração Esofágica/etiologia , Perfuração Esofágica/cirurgia , Gadolínio/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos
10.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 130: 111706, 2024 Mar 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: YH35324, a long-acting IgETrap-Fc fusion protein, is a novel therapeutic agent for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases. This randomized, double-blind, placebo/active-controlled, single ascending dose Phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of YH35324 in subjects with atopy. METHODS: Eligible subjects were healthy subjects or atopic adults with mild allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, or urticaria, and a serum total IgE level of 30-700 IU/mL (Part A) or > 700 IU/mL (Part B). In Part A, 35 subjects in 5 cohorts received YH35324 (0.3, 1, 3, 6, and 9 mg/kg), 8 received omalizumab (300 mg), and 9 received placebo. In Part B, 8 subjects received YH35324 and 8 received omalizumab. RESULTS: Twenty subjects (38.5 %) in Part A (YH35324: 37.1 %, omalizumab: 50.0 %, placebo: 33.3 %) and 10 subjects (62.5 %) in Part B (YH35324: 100 %; omalizumab: 25.0 %) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs were mostly grade 1/2; no serious AEs, AE-related treatment discontinuation, or anaphylaxis were reported. YH35324 exhibited dose-proportional increase in Cmax and AUClast over the dose range of 0.3-9 mg/kg. YH35324 rapidly suppressed serum-free IgE levels to a significant extent (< 25 and < 82.8 ng/mL, both P < 0.05) and with longer duration than omalizumab. CONCLUSION: This study showed that YH35324 has a favorable safety profile and is effective in reducing serum-free IgE levels in subjects with atopic conditions.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/induzido quimicamente , Imunoglobulina E , Método Duplo-Cego , Ligante de CD40
11.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0297902, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To properly assess an association between vaccines and specific adverse events requires a comparison between the observed and background rates; however, studies in South Korea are currently limited. Therefore, in this study, we estimated the background incidence of anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and mortality in South Korea. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Sample Cohort (NSC) data. Using NSC, the background incidence rate was estimated by dividing the number of episodes during 2009-2019 by the total population by year and then multiplying by 100,000. Using Statistics Korea data, the background mortality rate was estimated by dividing the number of deaths, during 2009-2019 by the standard population for that year and then multiplying by 100,000. Using background mortality rates, we predicted mortality rates for 2021 using autoregressive integrated moving average models. Further, the expected mortality rates were compared with observed mortality rates. RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence rate (AIR) of anaphylaxis increased from 4.28 to 22.90 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.003); myocarditis showed no significant increase, changing from 0.56 to 1.26 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.276); pericarditis increased from 0.94 to 1.88 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.005); and GBS increased from 0.78 to 1.21 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.013). The age-adjusted mortality rate decreased from 645.24 to 475.70 deaths per 100,000 population (p <0.001). The 2021 observed/expected mortality rates for overall (ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.08), men (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.07-1.08), and women (ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09), were all significantly higher. When stratified by age group, those aged ≥80 (ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.15-1.17), 60-69 (ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10-1.13), and 20-29 years old (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13) were also significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Through the estimation of background rates related to anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, GBS, and mortality, we established a reference point for evaluating the potential excess occurrence of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. This reference point serves as substantive evidence supporting the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Miocardite , Pericardite , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiologia , Incidência , Miocardite/induzido quimicamente , Miocardite/epidemiologia , Pericardite/induzido quimicamente , Pericardite/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
12.
J Clin Anesth ; 94: 111377, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241788

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of cefazolin perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) in patients with and without a penicillin allergy label (PAL) to determine whether the prevalence of cefazolin POA differs based on the presence of a PAL. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A large U.S. healthcare system in the Baltimore-D.C. region, July 2017 to July 2020. PATIENTS: 112,817 surgical encounters across inpatient and outpatient settings in various specialties, involving 90,089 patients. Of these, 4876 (4.3%) encounters had a PAL. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative cefazolin administration within 4 h before surgery to 4 h after the procedure began. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was cefazolin POA in patients with and without PALs. Potential POA cases were identified based on tryptase orders or diphenhydramine administrations within the initial cefazolin administration to 6 h postoperatively. Verification included two validation steps. The first checked for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) documentation, and the second, led by Allergy specialists, identified POA and the probable culprit. The secondary outcome looked at cefazolin use trends in patients with a PAL, stratified by setting and specialty. MAIN RESULTS: Of 112,817 encounters, 1421 (1.3%) had possible cefazolin HSRs. Of these, 22 (1.5%) had POA, resulting in a 0.02% prevalence. Of these, 13 (59.1%) were linked to cefazolin and 9 (40.9%) attributed to other drugs. Only one cefazolin POA case had a PAL, indicating no significant difference in cefazolin POA prevalence between patients with and without PALs (p = 0.437). Perioperative cefazolin use in patients with PALs steadily increased from 2.6% to 6.0% between 2017 and 2020, specifically in academic settings. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cefazolin POA does not exhibit significant differences between patients with and without PALs, and notably, the incidence remains remarkably low. Based on these findings, it is advisable to view cefazolin as an acceptable choice for prophylaxis in patients carrying a PAL.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Humanos , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos
13.
Intern Med ; 63(6): 873-876, 2024 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220191

RESUMO

A 69-year-old woman suffering with multiple myeloma developed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Shortly after administration of remdesivir, she presented with symptoms of facial flushing, wheezing, and hypoxemia. Subsequently, thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia rapidly manifested, leading to a diagnosis of enhanced fibrinolytic-type disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). This clinical presentation was considered an immediate hypersensitivity reaction with associated coagulation abnormalities induced by remdesivir. Although remdesivir is generally considered safe and efficacious in the treatment of COVID-19, physicians should remain vigilant regarding the potential for severe adverse events associated with this medication.


Assuntos
Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Anafilaxia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , COVID-19 , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/induzido quimicamente , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/complicações , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/complicações , COVID-19/complicações
14.
Yonsei Med J ; 65(2): 120-128, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38288652

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Following the withdrawal of propacetamol in Europe owing to safety issues, the regulatory authority of South Korea requested a post-marketing surveillance study to investigate its safety profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted nested case-control and case-time-control (CTC) analyses of cases and controls identified for outcomes of interest, including anaphylaxis, thrombosis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), using the claims database of South Korea, 2010-2019. Risk-set sampling was used to match each case with up to 10 controls for age, sex, cohort entry date, and follow-up duration. Exposure to anaphylaxis, thrombosis, and SJS was assessed within 7, 90, and 30 days of the index date, respectively. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using conditional logistic regression to assess the risk of outcomes associated with propacetamol. RESULTS: We identified cases of anaphylaxis (n=61), thrombosis (n=95), and SJS (n=1) and matched them to controls (173, 268, and 4, respectively). In the nested case-control analysis, the ORs for anaphylaxis and SJS were inestimable given the small number of propacetamol users during the risk period; meanwhile, the OR for thrombosis was 1.60 (95% CI 0.71-3.62). In the CTC design, the effect estimate was only estimated for thrombosis (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.09-3.47). CONCLUSION: In both nested case-control and CTC analyses, propacetamol was not associated with an increased risk of anaphylaxis, thrombosis, or SJS. The findings from this study, which used routinely collected clinical data, provide reassuring real-world evidence regarding the safety of propacetamol in a nationwide population to support regulatory decision-making.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Trombose , Humanos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Trombose/complicações
15.
Forensic Sci Int ; 356: 111943, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290418

RESUMO

Anaphylaxis is a serious reaction of systemic hypersensitivity with that rapid onset and sudden death. Drug hypersensitivity, particularly induced by ß-lactams, is one of the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis in adults. But identification of anaphylactic shock, in forensic sciences recently, is difficult, because it mainly depends on nonspecific characteristic morphological changes, as well as exclusion and circumstantial evidence. Here, we detected DNA methylation signatures of ß-lactams-induced fatal anaphylactic shock with the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation EPIC BeadChip, to screen potential forensic biomarkers and reveal the molecular mechanisms of drug-induced anaphylaxis with fatal shock and sudden death. Our results indicated that DNA methylation was associated with ß-lactams-induced fatal anaphylactic shock, in which the hypomethylation played a vital role. We found that 1459 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were mainly involved in ß-lactams-induced fatal anaphylactic shock by regulating MAPK and other signaling pathways. 18 DNA methylation signatures that could separate ß-lactams-induced anaphylactic shock from healthy individuals were identified. The altered methylation of DMPs can affect the transcription of corresponding genes and promote ß-lactams-induced fatal anaphylactic shock. The results suggest that DNA methylation can detect forensic identification markers of drug-induced anaphylaxis with fatal shock and sudden death, and it is an effective method for the forensic diagnosis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Adulto , Humanos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/genética , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos , Metilação de DNA , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Morte Súbita , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/complicações , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico
17.
J Autoimmun ; 143: 103164, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194789

RESUMO

The term Hoigné's syndrome denotes a mimicker of anaphylaxis, which occurs immediately after the parenteral administration of a drug and is likely caused by non-thrombotic pulmonary and systemic drug micro-embolization. It has so far been documented uniquely in case reports and small case series. Because this condition has never been systematically evaluated, we performed a structured literature review (pre-registered as CRD42023392962). The search was carried out in Excerpta Medica, National Library of Medicine, and Google Scholar. Cases with features consistent with anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, syncope, anxiety, or panic attack triggered by needle phobia, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity were excluded. For the final analysis, we retained reports published between 1951 and 2021, which presented 247 patients with Hoigné's syndrome: 37 children and 211 adults with a male: female ratio of 2.1 : 1.0. The patients presented within 1 min after parenteral administration of a drug (intramuscular penicillin in 90 % of the cases) with chest discomfort, shortness of breath, fear of death, psychomotor agitation, and auditory or visual hallucinations and impairment. Recovery occurred within 30 min. The diagnosis of Hoigné's syndrome was also established in five patients 66-91 years of age with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the aforementioned symptoms. It was therefore speculated that pulmonary drug micro-embolization induced a lethal cardiovascular compromise in these individuals. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. The diagnosis of Hoigné's pulmonary drug micro-embolization was established also in five patients with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the afore mentioned symptoms. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. In conclusion, Hoigné's syndrome is an uncommon non-immune-mediated reaction. This report seeks to promote broader awareness and knowledge regarding this alarming mimicker of anaphylaxis. Diagnosis relies solely on clinical evaluation.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Pneumopatias , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Penicilina G Procaína/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Alucinações/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome
19.
J Travel Med ; 31(2)2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anaphylaxis after receipt of yellow fever (YF) vaccine is highly variable based upon previously published reports. Anaphylaxis after receiving the YF vaccine has been reported to range from 0 up to 22 per 1 000 000 doses. Our clinical experience suggested increased incidence, which prompted our investigation. We sought to evaluate the current incidence rate of anaphylaxis after receipt of the 17D-204 strain YF-VAX® brand reported in the US. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports of anaphylaxis after receiving the YF-VAX vaccine occurring between 1 October 1999 and 30 September 2018. We utilized the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition and inclusion determination was made by a board-certified allergist. We also obtained the total number of YF-VAX doses distributed across the US during this same time-period and then calculated an updated incidence rate of YF-VAX vaccine-associated anaphylaxis. RESULTS: We identified 132 potential cases of possible or probable anaphylaxis. Of these, 111 met inclusion criteria: level 1 (n = 51), level 2 (n = 59) and level 3 (n = 1). The manufacturer reported a total distribution of 7 624 160 doses of YF-VAX from 1 October 1999 to 30 September 2018. The calculated incidence rate of YF-VAX vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is estimated at 14.6 events per 1 000 000 doses. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude the estimated rate of anaphylaxis per VAERS reports is 14.6 events per 1 000 000 doses after YF-VAX vaccination. This is consistent with some previous reports and substantially higher than rates of anaphylaxis after other vaccines.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Vacina contra Febre Amarela , Febre Amarela , Humanos , Febre Amarela/epidemiologia , Febre Amarela/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
20.
Allergol Int ; 73(1): 143-150, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most hospitals use electronic health records (EHR) to warn health care professionals of drug hypersensitivity (DH) and other allergies. Indiscriminate recording of patient self-reported allergies may bloat the alert system, leading to unjustified avoidances and increases in health costs. The aim of our study was to analyze hypersensitivities documented in EHR of patients at Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients admitted at least 24 h to CHUV between 2011 and 2021. After ethical clearance, we obtained anonymized data. Because culprit allergen could be either manually recorded or selected through a list, data was harmonized using a reference allergy database before undergoing statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 192,444 patients, 16% had at least one allergy referenced. DH constituted 60% of all allergy alerts, mainly beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) (30%), NSAID (11%) and iodinated contrast media (ICM) (7%). Median age at first hospitalization and hospitalization length were higher in the allergy group. Female to male ratio was 2:1 in the allergic group. Reactions were limited to the skin in half of patients, and consistent with anaphylaxis in 6%. In those deemed allergic to BLA, culprit drug was specified in 19%, 'allergy to penicillin' otherwise. It was impossible to distinguish DH based on history alone or resulting from specialized work-up. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, longer hospital stays, and female sex increase the odds of in-patient allergy documentation. Regarding DH, BLA were referenced in 4% of inpatient records. Specific delabeling programs should be implemented to increase data reliability and patient safety.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suíça/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Monobactamas , Documentação , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...